Its for a 350hp auto 396. Will have a 69 350 quadrajet to sell if i can find thr correct 68 carb.
4SPEED427 said
Jul 23, 2018
I think I have one. I will check for you in just a bit.
sixtyeightSD said
Jul 23, 2018
Carl Stevenson wrote:
I think I have one. I will check for you in just a bit.
Perfect thanks
4SPEED427 said
Jul 23, 2018
Shoot, sorry, mine's a 7028210. I thought it was from a 427 but it's a 396/325 I guess.
sixtyeightSD said
Jul 24, 2018
Carl Stevenson wrote:
Shoot, sorry, mine's a 7028210. I thought it was from a 427 but it's a 396/325 I guess.
Thanks for looking.
68 Grande said
Jul 24, 2018
Was the 7028218 a 800 CFM? I know the 7028210 is a 750 CFM for auto, just wondering what the difference is in the two carbs? Jake
-- Edited by 68 Grande on Tuesday 24th of July 2018 10:33:34 AM
sixtyeightSD said
Jul 25, 2018
I think its just the jets being different.only 800 was on buick gsx stage 1 i believe.
Taylor55 said
Jul 25, 2018
1969 Pontiac 428 390 hp also had an 800 cfm. 1977/78 and some early 79 Pontiac 400 W72 engine package also used an 800 cfm .
Al
unruhjonny said
Aug 27, 2018
sorry to chime in a little late here;
ALL 1967-1970 Quadrajets are 750cfm.
That changed in 1971:
Pontiac modified the fuel bowl by removing one of the booster rings for 1971 to increase CFM and used it on all the 455HO and the 400's with a manual transmission. As I've come to understand it, this single booster ring presented some low idle/light throttle driveablility issues to the point that many original owners apparently had dual booster ring fuel bowls/carburetors swapped in place of the original unit. Pontiac went back to the dual booster ring 750cfm fuel bowl for 1972.
Buick revised the casting, and as a result have an 800cfm dual booster ring fuel bowl starting in 1971; I don't have a full application listing, but understand they were only put on the higher power 455 engines.
Pontiac first used the "Buick designed" 800cfm fuel bowl in 1973 with the SD455, then adapted it to everything from 1975 forward.
I am unaware of Chevrolet engines EVER using an 800cfm Quadrajet - but suspect that some applications used them after 1975 or 1976.
As far as I'm aware, all 1967-1969 Chevrolet Quadrajets were visually identical... I have only owned a few.
-- Edited by unruhjonny on Monday 27th of August 2018 03:40:10 PM
sixtyeightSD said
Aug 27, 2018
Good info.
Started running the car.runs good up past 5000rpm.talked to the owner.was a napa rebuilt from 25 years ago.maybe it is set up for the 396.
Its for a 350hp auto 396. Will have a 69 350 quadrajet to sell if i can find thr correct 68 carb.
Perfect thanks
Thanks for looking.
Was the 7028218 a 800 CFM? I know the 7028210 is a 750 CFM for auto, just wondering what the difference is in the two carbs?
Jake
-- Edited by 68 Grande on Tuesday 24th of July 2018 10:33:34 AM
1969 Pontiac 428 390 hp also had an 800 cfm. 1977/78 and some early 79 Pontiac 400 W72 engine package also used an 800 cfm .
Al
sorry to chime in a little late here;
ALL 1967-1970 Quadrajets are 750cfm.
That changed in 1971:
Pontiac modified the fuel bowl by removing one of the booster rings for 1971 to increase CFM and used it on all the 455HO and the 400's with a manual transmission.
As I've come to understand it, this single booster ring presented some low idle/light throttle driveablility issues to the point that many original owners apparently had dual booster ring fuel bowls/carburetors swapped in place of the original unit.
Pontiac went back to the dual booster ring 750cfm fuel bowl for 1972.
Buick revised the casting, and as a result have an 800cfm dual booster ring fuel bowl starting in 1971;
I don't have a full application listing, but understand they were only put on the higher power 455 engines.
Pontiac first used the "Buick designed" 800cfm fuel bowl in 1973 with the SD455, then adapted it to everything from 1975 forward.
I am unaware of Chevrolet engines EVER using an 800cfm Quadrajet - but suspect that some applications used them after 1975 or 1976.
As far as I'm aware, all 1967-1969 Chevrolet Quadrajets were visually identical... I have only owned a few.
-- Edited by unruhjonny on Monday 27th of August 2018 03:40:10 PM
Started running the car.runs good up past 5000rpm.talked to the owner.was a napa rebuilt from 25 years ago.maybe it is set up for the 396.