Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Trim rings, yay or nay?
Should I put trim rings on my wheels? [26 vote(s)]

Leave it alone. It looks bad ass big block tough!
34.6%
What were you thinking Todd? Put on the damn rings!
65.4%


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:
RE: Trim rings, yay or nay?


What about every 68-75 Corvette in the WORLD  LOL

__________________

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 699
Date:

Are you chaps still at it?!!!!!

__________________

Ah yes! I remember it well!!! (With Pictures)

  1. 1965 Malibu 4dr Sedan L6 (Original)
  2. 1975 Chevrolet Kommando 305 (Monaro Clone)
  3. 2000 Peugeot 406 2.0L
  4. 1996 VW Golf Chico


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 26818
Date:

Since 65.4% of you said to put on the rings, I've decided to leave them off.biggrin

__________________

Todd
Site Founder

Like us on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/CanadianPoncho

Canadian Poncho World Headquarters - Prince Edward Island

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2672
Date:

69Laurentian wrote:

Since 65.4% of you said to put on the rings, I've decided to leave them off.biggrin



That's what Toronto Mayor David Miller does too, ignores what 2/3rds of his constituents want him to do, only in our case, it's a bit more serious!cry

Now we are hearing the garbage strike may not be over after all, hard to believe condisering he basically caved and gave the unions everything they wanted.confuse

 



__________________
Hillar

1970 LS4 (eventually an LS5) Laurentian 2dr hdtp
-and a bunch of other muscle cars...


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

69Laurentian wrote:

Since 65.4% of you said to put on the rings, I've decided to leave them off.biggrin



I was looking back over old photos of my 66 Chevelle SS396 convert, after I installed high-lift rear springs and 8" Corvette rally wheels, first I had the trim rings on and it looked great, but as time went by they got some curb rash (sad to say that I was not as careful then as I am now) and I took them off, and I did like that look better - a bit more of a non-nonsense attitude I guess. But better with them off.

Which is how I voted, in the minority, but correct, eh wink.gif

Dave

P.S. unlike politicians e.g. mayors, who are essentially lying thieving scum, the only reason they pretend to want to know what you have to say is so they can claim that "I have listened to the people" while lining their pockets and those of their cronies.

 



__________________

56Pontiac  1956 Pontiac Pathfinder 2dr sedan, 496 - dyno'd 545 hp, stick shift, 4.11 posi - Hot Rod

  1964 Acadian Beaumont SD convert, 283 - factory 195 hp, Powerglide, 3.08 10-bolt - Cruiser

  2012 US-built crew cab truck - Daily Driver and Boat Trailering



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 26818
Date:

I guess if you guys owned part of the car I'd put the rings on, but since ya don't I don't put 'em on.


__________________

Todd
Site Founder

Like us on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/CanadianPoncho

Canadian Poncho World Headquarters - Prince Edward Island

 



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 184
Date:

Put them on.
It's only YOU that matters anyway. But I like 'em

__________________


Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3813
Date:

That a boy a true leader.

__________________

1957 Pathfinder deluxe 4 door wagon
1961 Pontiac Parisienne bubble top Traded for a Harley sorry guys.

2007 Grand Prix Gxp

2009 Pontiac Montana SV6

Winnipeg MB 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:



 


      JULY 09     I can't stand it!!! I put the 8 inch rally trim rings back on!!!!clueless.gif 

 



      Sorry  Didn't mean to be a **** disturberconfuse  I was just "sharing" that my car looks better with trim rings on biggrin The car is already plain ugly, so it needs all the help it can, to be beautifull

 



__________________

 

«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.