Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: HERE WE GO!!!!


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5682
Date:
HERE WE GO!!!!


I just watched CTV news net & they had a story about Quebec bringing a new emmissions law, that every car over 15 yrs. old "must" pass a emm. test or be taken off the road, nothing was said about "collector cars. If this spreads across the provinces, we are in TROUBLE The polititions don't care about the us, & they are after VOTES so they go GREEN to show how green they are, & sucker those into voting for them!!  Keep a watch on this!!!! Is this a ploy to get us to buy "new " green cars from the Co's that they BAILED out. Didn't work in the US, as mostly IMPORTS were sold during the CLUNKER program

__________________

Some times I wake up GRUMPY, but today I let her sleep in    !!!!!!!! BLACKSTOCK Ont.



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4767
Date:

got a ticket in quebec years ago on a 53 harley for signals lights. bike didn't come with them but they didn't care

__________________

sTevE

55 GMC, 70 Pontiac 2+2 rag



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1560
Date:

There are movements afoot everywhere.
http://green.autoblog.com/2008/10/17/rac-cars-over-18-years-old-should-be-scrapped/

Anyone for moving all the car guys to a central location and then declaring an independent country? wink

__________________



         www.67HEAVEN.com
Re-thinking the entire site design



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

67HEAVEN wrote:


Anyone for moving all the car guys to a central location and then declaring an independent country? wink

Yes!!!!!!

          Or allow Quebec to leave biggrin and put up toll roads, so they can't come inwink 

         This is my biggest peeve. We are bilingual in Canada and must mark everything accordingly, EXCEPT in Quebec?   thats BS.. 

 



__________________

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2050
Date:

427carl wrote:

67HEAVEN wrote:


Anyone for moving all the car guys to a central location and then declaring an independent country? wink

Yes!!!!!!

          Or allow Quebec to leave biggrin and put up toll roads, so they can't come inwink 

         This is my biggest peeve. We are bilingual in Canada and must mark everything accordingly, EXCEPT in Quebec?   thats BS.. 

 

I'm In! I say build a wall around Quebec, and then fill it with water. ( being born and raised in Montreal, I can say this!) Only thing we need to save are the Canadians, GO HABS GO!number1.gif


 



__________________


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1560
Date:

It's not just Quebec, my fire-breathing compatriots. smile

 

I wonder what the impact of the item marked in red will be on Manitobans?



__________________



         www.67HEAVEN.com
Re-thinking the entire site design



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2335
Date:

Where is the warmest  place in Canada?? somewhere that we could drive almost year round?? Probably out here on the west coast. No u guys have to stay out there inthe cold. Not enough room for everyone out here. LOL. There is a lot of Guys in the Vancouver BC area that do have to go through Aircare with their older cars and they do pass, they must lean them out and use high octane fuel to get through.

__________________

64 Lemans, 4spd

Vancouver Island B.C.



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

Sad to say, what us car guys need are lawyers (yes, I too would also prefer guns, but ...). The only way to stop the politicians and their stupid regulations are with legal counterattacks. I sure hope that the aftermarket industry can help, I cannot think of any other organized group that could. Maybe forward the information above to them and ask what they can do to help?

http://98.129.194.116/Government.aspx

Although when I look closely at the stuff on that website, I see that they represent only the parts manufacturers, not the enthusiast - for example, they are all in favor of emissions testing since that will lead to more sales of emissios parts.
I don't know if there is a trade association for the restoration industry, surely they would be interested in this fight?

The whole anti-car movement has parallels to the environazis and anti-boaters others who say "we don't like what you are doing so we will trump up specious claims [i.e. based on bad science and massaged data] against you and use our loud clamor to convince politicians to do what we want"

Gotta have lawyers to fight that, eh?

If you have not read Michael Crichton's 'State of Fear' I highly recommend it.

Dave

__________________

56Pontiac  1956 Pontiac Pathfinder 2dr sedan, 496 - dyno'd 545 hp, stick shift, 4.11 posi - Hot Rod

  1964 Acadian Beaumont SD convert, 283 - factory 195 hp, Powerglide, 3.08 10-bolt - Cruiser

  2012 US-built crew cab truck - Daily Driver and Boat Trailering



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5682
Date:

Is there any groups here in the Great White North other than the antique guys [that hate modifieds] that are involved in fighting this B/S that the provincial & Federal Gov. keep coming up with to "kill" the old car hobby. The MOE started going after older cars this summer here in Ontario for emm. & are going to hit the Hot Rods next summer from what i was told, so this could be the beginning of the "crack down"or CASH GRAB whatever way you look at it.

__________________

Some times I wake up GRUMPY, but today I let her sleep in    !!!!!!!! BLACKSTOCK Ont.



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1560
Date:

New Brunswick............

"...this vehicle has been modified from the manufacturer's original design...."




__________________



         www.67HEAVEN.com
Re-thinking the entire site design



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5682
Date:

67HEAVEN wrote:

New Brunswick............

"...this vehicle has been modified from the manufacturer's original design...."



Lovely, just F%^$ing LOVELY I've never heard of that happening, but can see it's been done. Noticed that they did not say have it inspected by a mechanic, but by an engineer[ not the train type] & I'll bet that was expensive. Anyone know the outcome of this incident???

__________________

Some times I wake up GRUMPY, but today I let her sleep in    !!!!!!!! BLACKSTOCK Ont.



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Online
Posts: 48941
Date:

67HEAVEN wrote:

 

It's not just Quebec, my fire-breathing compatriots. smile

 

I wonder what the impact of the item marked in red will be on Manitobans?

 



Wow, I'm born and raised here and hadn't heard a word about that one.

What a pile of idiots we have! There are people who can't afford anything better than a thousand dollar car. Pretty soon we'll have to be rich to stay here...

 



__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars (now converted to a "factory" 4 speed)



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1560
Date:

dualquadpete wrote:

......just F%^$ing LOVELY I've never heard of that happening, but can see it's been done. Noticed that they did not say have it inspected by a mechanic, but by an engineer[ not the train type] & I'll bet that was expensive. Anyone know the outcome of this incident???




I don't know the outcome, but you're correct. The vehicle owner cannot go to a local mechanic and have the car certified as safe. Oh no. It's off to a professional engineer.

The link in that New Brunswick letter takes you here - http://www.acec-nb.ca/en/home/

Good luck even finding a mechanical engineer who would care to offer a "professional" opinion on vehicle modifications.



__________________



         www.67HEAVEN.com
Re-thinking the entire site design



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1560
Date:

Carl Stevenson wrote:

What a pile of idiots we have! There are people who can't afford anything better than a thousand dollar car. Pretty soon we'll have to be rich to stay here...


How right you are, C1. How right you are.

========================================
dotclear.gif

dotclear.gif
The end of the classic car
b.gif
By Brian Cooley
Editor at large
June 1, 2005
It is with great regret that I report the death of the classic car.

Under "cause of death," the autopsy report won't cite today's many inelegant designs nor will it point to dwindling interest among the populace in restoring and preserving machines that evoke the past. Instead, the cause of death will read: "Obsolescence by extreme infiltration of 1s and 0s." In other words, digital technologies will make tomorrow's old cars unsustainable.

b.gif

dotclear.gif
b.gif
The vast classic car hobby gets much of its lifeblood from a thriving cottage industry of aftermarket parts makers. One may specialize in rubber seals and carpet sets for early Corvettes, while another concentrates on Thunderbird taillight lenses and sequential turn-signal controllers. Still, others offer cranks, cams, and blocks for Ford's 289-429 V-8s, and the list goes on--all are needs left behind by their original maker.

So how will these small parts manufacturers offer, say, a replacement IMA controller for a 2005 Honda Insight when that car is 35 years old? How about a voice-recognition module for a 2006 Lexus GS 430 30 years down the road? Will these vendors have the skills to reverse engineer complex digital parts, and if they do, how will they amortize the cost of a chip foundry cranking out replacements in quantities of probably just a few thousand? And even if they figure all of that out, where will the money come from to defend themselves in court from a phalanx of auto-industry lawyers pursuing an action under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act for intellectual property theft?

Carmakers hold the keys to a car's longevity like never before. Sure, they want their cars on the road long enough to build a reputation of durability, but they don't want it to be so long that you don't come back to buy another one. When your car turns 20 years old (max), the guys at your dealership's parts counter start looking at you funny. They chuckle a little as they futilely look up the part you want for your 1985 something or other. I should know; I have cars dating back to '88, '67, and '66. But if I had been born 30 years later, I'd probably have to take up orchids as a pastime instead.

As a particular model ages, carmakers start to phase out certain parts from their catalog, and trim elements, such as headliners, A-pillar garnishes, and dashboard bezels, usually go first. Small engine parts disappear next, especially belt-driven accessories and odd little valves and relays. Later, even heavy iron, such as cranks, cams, and heads, go poof. But the good news is that all of the above can be reproduced by a competent aftermarket.

A car's digital elements are a different story. The main engine management computer in your car is extraordinarily complex, and you aren't going anywhere without it. And there are typically a dozen other processors in today's cars, all just as complex. Worse, they're proprietary, so once you figure out how to reverse engineer Ford's EEC-IV module, that's it--you've reverse engineered Ford's EEC-IV module. You want to do an older Volvo computer too? Start from scratch. And don't even think about the technology that controls safety gear, such as air bags and ABS. With enormous liabilities, as well as federal and state regulation, nobody will try and reproduce safety components.

Junkyards have traditionally been a source of salvation for old car restoration, but again, regulation is increasingly making it illegal to chase parts for your car. Emissions control and supplemental restraint parts are fraught with legal oversight, and I can see a day when more components go the same way. Imagine needing a new set of batteries for your 22-year-old Prius, long after Toyota has stopped making them. You find a low-mileage, lightly rolled Prius in a junkyard with a good battery pack but are told by the scary guy at the front desk that they can sell those to only a licensed toxic waste recycler. This is the kind of scenario you can count on your car-stupid legislators to create.

Now, if you think all this hand-wringing affects just a few guys in cardigans with too much money and too many shiny old cars in their mansion's garage, think again. Regular people who need a cheap car are in serious trouble; just as the classic car goes extinct, so does the reliable beater. Patching up your '82 Ford Fairmont with parts from AutoZone is a perfectly sound transportation strategy today. But do you really think a 23-year-old Nissan Murano will be patched up the same way? Not so much.

 

A lot of car cynics say none of this matters like it used to, that today's cars are not destined to be classics anyway. I agree that today's cars lack the soul that made yesterday's models so fascinating, but the fact remains that if you like cars at all, the vehicles of your childhood will beckon you in your 40s. It's human nature. You may have memories of being an 8-year-old, riding in your parents' Lexus RX 400h and listening to Maroon 5 on that funky old FM band people used to tune into. But by 2046, when you seek and find that vintage 400h, you'll probably only be able to display it on blocks.



SOURCE - http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-10895_7-6232754-1.html

It's worth reading that story ALL THE WAY THROUGH. no

 



__________________



         www.67HEAVEN.com
Re-thinking the entire site design



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2050
Date:

Too true. Let's pick up the fight boys.

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4731
Date:

Given that our demographic and older are the only ones who bother to vote anymore we should have a fair bit of influence. 

We have to use the angle that we are the original reusers and  recyclers!  All the greeno-come-latelys don't even know the real meaning of the word.  They figure because they recycle their totally unnecessary plastic water bottles they are purer than the driven snow.

Sanctimonious A------s is what they are.

(Is my annoyance showing?)
 

__________________

ken from northern Alberta

38 Willys pickup electric

39 Buick (327 with 700 r4)

66 Beaumont 4 door hardtop

69 Chevy CST pickup

1976 GMC 23'  motorhome

1994 Impala SS (temporary, according to my wife)



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5682
Date:

dualquadpete wrote:

Is there any groups here in the Great White North other than the antique guys [that hate modifieds] that are involved in fighting this B/S that the provincial & Federal Gov. keep coming up with to "kill" the old car hobby. The MOE started going after older cars this summer here in Ontario for emm. & are going to hit the Hot Rods next summer from what i was told, so this could be the beginning of the "crack down"or CASH GRAB whatever way you look at it.



Great responses, but, nobody answered the main question, is there a "body" out there, other than the antique guys that have a VOICE, in the US SEMA is at the forfront in battling the congress to put these "stupid" bills in the dumpster,but I don't know of a group like that in Canada. Would they listen to a bunch of car guys & girls with no "clout" & very few who would vote the buggers back in??? 

__________________

Some times I wake up GRUMPY, but today I let her sleep in    !!!!!!!! BLACKSTOCK Ont.



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:



Sanctimonious A------s is what they are.

(Is my annoyance showing?)
 



     We will tell them , we will recycle them, when WE are done with them!!! disbelief

I am going to take my car (in the spring), and have a E test   I will bet you a box of ____  that I can get it to pass!!!! smile

 



__________________

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6366
Date:

427carl wrote:



Sanctimonious A------s is what they are.

(Is my annoyance showing?)
 



     We will tell them , we will recycle them, when WE are done with them!!! disbelief

I am going to take my car (in the spring), and have a E test   I will bet you a box of ____  that I can get it to pass!!!! smile

 



When an 85 had to be e-tested my wife had a 305 v-8 in a Grand Prix-I leaned it to a point that it ran incredibly poor but passed !
 My brother had a 90 454 SS pick up with no cats-got roadside test-passed flying colors-never looked underneath-just put the pipes on the tails !
 what a farce !

 



__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

 




When an 85 had to be e-tested my wife had a 305 v-8 in a Grand Prix-I leaned it to a point that it ran incredibly poor but passed !

 My brother had a 90 454 SS pick up with no cats-got roadside test-passed flying colors-never looked underneath-just put the pipes on the tails !
 

what a farce !

 



       "That Farce"   might work in our favor in the future  lol  

 



__________________

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 10281
Date:

It's time we all start to keep our heads up.

__________________
65 Laurentian post, 67 Grande Parisienne 4 door HT. 
 


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4731
Date:

There's an old saying, "The solution to pollution is dilution."  If you think about it pollution is just the concentration of something that in a diluted state might be quite harmless.(or under arbitrary limits)  That being said, I'm sure there are many ways to make an adequate amount of fresh air come out a tailpipe during an emission test.  I always thought that pretty much was the concept of the old air pump that everybody tossed off thier car back in the early  days of pollution equipment.  

Course i ain't no engineer.

Of course there's more this than that. The greenies really just don't like fossils af any kind, be it cars, fuel or us for that matter. 

 


__________________

ken from northern Alberta

38 Willys pickup electric

39 Buick (327 with 700 r4)

66 Beaumont 4 door hardtop

69 Chevy CST pickup

1976 GMC 23'  motorhome

1994 Impala SS (temporary, according to my wife)



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2335
Date:

We could make use of a temporary Cat Convertor, buy or find a good used one and have someone make up some flanges, bolt it on and take it in, after remove the pipe, might look stupid, but would probably help make it pass.

__________________

64 Lemans, 4spd

Vancouver Island B.C.



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5682
Date:

It appears that some of you are all ready down for the count!!! Figuring out ways to "pass" this "dumbass" test, when we should be trying to stop these A$$ holes from even having our collector cars even considered for testing!!!  Again, does anyone know a group we could get in with, to stop this, [like SEMA in the States] there's got to be something here, or do we allways "roll over" like good sheep & go with the flow & say "excuse me" like all good Canadians do & FOLD UP Come on boys & girls, we have to be ready if they start pressing this idea across the country. Are there any members on here from Quebec!!!! Before we build the wall,may be one of them can "splain" what's goin on" IN ENGLISH

__________________

Some times I wake up GRUMPY, but today I let her sleep in    !!!!!!!! BLACKSTOCK Ont.



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2249
Date:

SEMA, that's who I was trying to remember, they are the big guns us old car lovers have behind us. But sorry guys, it looks like they limit themselves to the US. Maybe an inquiry to them to see if there is a counterpart in Canada to help with such problems?

http://www.sema.org/government-affairs

All this stuff coming at us down the pike makes me depressed, I think I will go and drink heavily. Spiked egg nog, in keeping with the season, eh?

Dave



__________________

56Pontiac  1956 Pontiac Pathfinder 2dr sedan, 496 - dyno'd 545 hp, stick shift, 4.11 posi - Hot Rod

  1964 Acadian Beaumont SD convert, 283 - factory 195 hp, Powerglide, 3.08 10-bolt - Cruiser

  2012 US-built crew cab truck - Daily Driver and Boat Trailering

1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.