Save 5% at Vevor and Support Canadian Poncho!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: "Wide Track" - not really?


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1312
Date:
"Wide Track" - not really?


As you're likely aware the marketing spiel for '69 B-Bodies in the US was "Wide Track", and they used it in Canada too, even though it's an Imapla chassis.  So I looked it up:

US Pontiac:  64" front track
Canadian:    63.5" front track

Ford Galaxie: 63" front, 64" rear

So I take it Pontiacs weren't really any wider than Chevrolets.... or Fords!



__________________
Front%20Corner.jpg
Rear%20Corner.jpg
Gauges.jpg
Engine.jpg
Interior%20Left.jpg


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1067
Date:

1/2 inch..........to some guys, that means something...........

__________________


Hanover, Ont

Ontario Rodders Forum

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 10625
Date:

I think it was more of a look than anything. If you would picture a 66 Galaxie vs a 66 Grande, the Ford just looks far taller and narrower that it really probably is. The Pontiac's were styled to look long, low and wide.



__________________
 67 Grande Parisienne 4 door HT. 69 Parisienne Convertible.
 


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5990
Date:

Jim Wangers of Pontiac marketing  fame, said it was solely a gimmick for Pontiac sales. 



__________________

1957 Pontiac Pathfinder Deluxe sedan restored 261 six

1974 Chevrolet Caprice Estate wagon low mileage original 400 V-8



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

We're not sure what was happening in the Pontiac division circa 1963. Most car advertisements of that era showed autos in action -- a day at the beach in a new convertible, perhaps, or a European exotic in a picturesque locale.

Not this Pontiac magazine spot. It dispensed with the usual backdrops in favor of no backdrop at all. There is a Pontiac, yes, but also a motorcycle ridden by a mysterious, red jump suit-wearing woman.

Look at her. She's not envious of the spaced-out Pontiac driver to her left; if we had to guess, we'd say she's simply bemused. If someone had paid us to participate in the production of this advertisement, we'd be bemused as well.

There is tension: The Pontiac driver is smug, trying to pretend the moon-woman beside him doesn't exist. Perhaps he is caught up in another Wide-Track fantasy.

You really, really need Wide-Track if you drive a car, you know, he thinks to himself, and say, what the hell is 'Wide-Track' anyway?

Well, we poked around, and our suspicions were correct: It was largely a marketing gimmick revolving around the fact that the wheels on Pontiacs of the era were set slightly farther apart than those on other GM products. The track of the '59 Pontiac was, for example, 3 inches wider than that of the '59 Cadillac.

This may have helped keep Pontiacs glued to the track -- to the extent that Pontiacs were ever taken to the track -- but mostly it just gave advertising something to seize on.

And seize they did. Advertisements like the one below were the result.

1-cda98733a1.jpg

 

 

 


 
 
 

 



-- Edited by 427carl on Thursday 25th of February 2016 03:46:53 PM

Attachments
__________________

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.