2024 Canadian Poncho Calendars are Now Available! CLICK HERE

 

 

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Historical Perspective


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Date:
Historical Perspective


Anyone know when GM of Canada stopped putting the 261 c.i.d. GMC truck 6-cylinder in our Ponchos as the base engine, and went to the stovebolt Chevy 6?  My bro and I are arguing - our father had a new Strato Chief company car every year from '58-'68 (and another in '70) and we both remember him puking when the new one had the 235 c.i.d. engine AND Powerglide; he needed to plan his passes on 2-lanes VERY carefully, that year.  I think it was the light beige '64, Bro's convinced it was his Autumn Gold '63.

 

 



__________________

see2xu

66 Beau 2DHT 427FI, 700R



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5990
Date:

Chris, the Canadian 261 in line six was put in Canadian Pontiac's from 1955 to 1962 only. It is based on the American Chevrolet truck engine but there are some differences, the main difference being that the Canadian 261 had hydraulic valve lifters and it never got a full flow oil filter. As of 1963, the full size Canadian Pontiac got the standard Chevrolet in line six (230). The 235 Chevrolet in line six was never put in a Canadian Pontiac. 



__________________

1957 Pontiac Pathfinder Deluxe sedan restored 261 six

1974 Chevrolet Caprice Estate wagon low mileage original 400 V-8



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4508
Date:

The 261 was a good engine. Pulled very well. So was the replacement 230/250 from 63 onward. Lots of power in these engines for a full size Chevy or Pontiac in the 60s. 



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

69 Parisienne 2 dr ht 427

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1685
Date:

A friend had a 64 Parisienne convertible with a 283 2 barrel and a powerglide in the early 70s. A friend of his had a 64 Strato Chief four door with a 230 and a powerglide. I was told that the 283 was much better on gas than the 230 six. I once owned a Ford pickup with a 300 six and it was much worse then a 302 as far as gas mileage. Some six cylinder economy engines were anything but economical.

Paul

__________________


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

If memory serves me right, even the 235 in Chev was replaced with the 230 in 1963. My Dad had a new 62 Biscayne with a 235, 3 on the tree. The biggest lemon he ever owned, had to rebuild it in less than 30K miles. He had a 57 Strato Chief with a 261 before that and he ever regret trading it in for the Chev. The 261 worked circles around the 235, pulled harder and better on gas. If you wanted to go by someone just throw it in 2nd gear and you were gone. If you wanted to pass with the Chev throw it in 2nd gear and it laughed at you unless you were going down a steep hill and that was the god's honest truth.

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4508
Date:

Glenn Musgrave wrote:

If memory serves me right, even the 235 in Chev was replaced with the 230 in 1963. My Dad had a new 62 Biscayne with a 235, 3 on the tree. The biggest lemon he ever owned, had to rebuild it in less than 30K miles. He had a 57 Strato Chief with a 261 before that and he ever regret trading it in for the Chev. The 261 worked circles around the 235, pulled harder and better on gas. If you wanted to go by someone just throw it in 2nd gear and you were gone. If you wanted to pass with the Chev throw it in 2nd gear and it laughed at you unless you were going down a steep hill and that was the god's honest truth.


 I know the 261 was a great engine. I'm surprised the 235 was as poor as you describe as I believe it's the same basic engine as the 261. I wonder if the 235 had the remote oil filter that my 62 261 had. Perhaps they were standard on all the 6 cylinders by then but if not did this make a difference to longevity?



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

69 Parisienne 2 dr ht 427

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1349
Date:

Remote oil filters were an accessory in the early years 55-57 and probably became standard later on. These filters did not make any difference except to lower oil pressure a little bit. It all comes down to regular oil changes and keeping the internal engine parts clean. A 235 six was a dog compared to a 261 as I had both 235 in a 55 Belair and my 261 in my 55 Pontiac. The 261 has torque and when you want to pass you can. I have taken guys for a ride in my 55 and they are all impressed with the pulling power of the big six. The rear 3:70 ratio helps to.

Al

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4508
Date:

Never had a 235 but I agree with you, the 261 could sure move along. 



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

69 Parisienne 2 dr ht 427

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

Glenn Musgrave wrote:

If memory serves me right, even the 235 in Chev was replaced with the 230 in 1963. My Dad had a new 62 Biscayne with a 235, 3 on the tree. The biggest lemon he ever owned, had to rebuild it in less than 30K miles. He had a 57 Strato Chief with a 261 before that and he ever regret trading it in for the Chev. The 261 worked circles around the 235, pulled harder and better on gas. If you wanted to go by someone just throw it in 2nd gear and you were gone. If you wanted to pass with the Chev throw it in 2nd gear and it laughed at you unless you were going down a steep hill and that was the god's honest truth.


 I know the 261 was a great engine. I'm surprised the 235 was as poor as you describe as I believe it's the same basic engine as the 261. I wonder if the 235 had the remote oil filter that my 62 261 had. Perhaps they were standard on all the 6 cylinders by then but if not did this make a difference to longevity?

I don't remember the oil filter system in it.  Giving the 235's the benefit of the doubt, I think my Dad's was simply a dud.  I bought a 79 Delta 88 new from Saskatoon Motors, it had a 301 (4.9L) V8, that was another factory dud.  Had it to many dealer ships across Canada and no one could find why it had no power on hills and only gave me 14 mph when it was rated for 26 mpg EPA.  I solved the problem when the car was 1 year old by putting in a 403 (6.6L) and everything improved including my love the car.  The guy who bought the 301 tore it down and discovered the timing chain was off a tooth.  He corrected it and then put it in a taxi that he drove for several more years.



__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20051
Date:

Glenn Musgrave wrote:
  The guy who bought the 301 tore it down and discovered the timing chain was off a tooth.  He corrected it and then put it in a taxi that he drove for several more years.

 So the 301 had a manufacturing issue, not that all 301's left the factory with timing chain mis-aligned. Seeing service as a Taxi engine for years kinda points to durability and reliability.



__________________

Ray White, Toronto ON

1973 LeMans 454 "Astro-Jet"

Built March 9, 1973 - Oshawa ON

1993 Corvette Convertible LT 1

Built January 10, 1993 - Bowling Green Kentucky 

 




Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4505
Date:

The 235 & 261 sixes evolved from the original stovebolt of 1929. A few displacement increases then a significant update in 1936 carried them through with minimal changes after. The 235 came out in U.S. big trucks in 1942 but didn't make it to passenger cars until 1950 on Powerglide cars.  Full pressure oiling was added to the design on the Powerglide versions, then on all version starting 1954. 1954 was the year Chevy introduced the 261 Jobmaster in big trucks. The hydraulic lifter 261 was a Canadian Pontiac exclusive from 1955-62. As you can see the design goes way back. Meanwhile foundry and thin-wall casting techniques evolved to the point where the V8 was significantly lighter than the old inline six. The redesign was rolled out in stages, first for '62 was the 153 L4 & 194 L6 in Chevy II's & Acadians. Combining the bore & pistons of the 153 onto the 194 produced the 230 starting in 1963. They had 7 main bearing, full pressure lubrication & full-flow oil filtration, improved port configuration, a common bellhousing pattern matching the V8s, plus they were a darn sight lighter. The 292 was a taller block version to accommodate the longer stroke without having rod angularity problems. It was never conceived to have hood clearance for passenger cars, just trucks.

 

So why not a 292 six in a Canadian Pontiac? It may have been a bit much and it may not have delivered the fuel economy cheapskate 6-cylinder buyers sought. Then there's the issue of block height, which will put your air-cleaner through the hood, at least using the cooking-pot type air cleaners used with downdraft carbs of their time.  Meanwhile at Ford a crank swap is all it takes to turn a 240 into a 300, but Chevrolet based the 292 on a taller block with the fuel pump & RHS motor mount relocated. Again the 300 was no fuel economy champ, but it was certainly a champ (like the 292).

You know those inline sixes with their natural power pulses coming in every 120 degrees of crank rotation, combined with mild camshaft timing makes them pull surprisingly strong off idle up to mid-range, where carburetor & manifold restrictions end the power there.

 



__________________

67 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe, Oshawa-built 250 PG never disturbed.

In garage, 296 cid inline six & TH350...

Cam, Toronto.


I don't judge a man by how far he's fallen, but by how far back he bounces - Patton



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5990
Date:

gparis7 wrote:
Glenn Musgrave wrote:

If memory serves me right, even the 235 in Chev was replaced with the 230 in 1963. My Dad had a new 62 Biscayne with a 235, 3 on the tree. The biggest lemon he ever owned, had to rebuild it in less than 30K miles. He had a 57 Strato Chief with a 261 before that and he ever regret trading it in for the Chev. The 261 worked circles around the 235, pulled harder and better on gas. If you wanted to go by someone just throw it in 2nd gear and you were gone. If you wanted to pass with the Chev throw it in 2nd gear and it laughed at you unless you were going down a steep hill and that was the god's honest truth.


 I know the 261 was a great engine. I'm surprised the 235 was as poor as you describe as I believe it's the same basic engine as the 261. I wonder if the 235 had the remote oil filter that my 62 261 had. Perhaps they were standard on all the 6 cylinders by then but if not did this make a difference to longevity?


 The by pass remote oil filter was a dealer option for both the 235 and the 261 and they were never standard issue. It was a very poor filter system that did very little for the 3-4 pounds of oil pressure that it stole from your engine to operate. A number of years ago when i learned of the oil pressure loss, i disconnected my by pass oil filter on my 57 261 and just have it in there for looks only. Some folks will say that it is better than nothing, well it just about is nothing because it only filter very small amounts at a time and that is why it is called a by pass system. It by passes most of the oil and filters so little for that oil pressure loss. 



__________________

1957 Pontiac Pathfinder Deluxe sedan restored 261 six

1974 Chevrolet Caprice Estate wagon low mileage original 400 V-8



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4508
Date:

CdnGMfan wrote:

So why not a 292 six in a Canadian Pontiac? It may have been a bit much and it may not have delivered the fuel economy cheapskate 6-cylinder buyers sought. Then there's the issue of block height, which will put your air-cleaner through the hood, at least using the cooking-pot type air cleaners used with downdraft carbs of their time .... You know those inline sixes with their natural power pulses coming in every 120 degrees of crank rotation, combined with mild camshaft timing makes them pull surprisingly strong off idle up to mid-range, where carburetor & manifold restrictions end the power there.

 


Cam, now you are making me want to build up a 292. There's one for sale locally out of a late 60s Chev pickup. I'd like to get it, but what would I put it in? 

Truth is that I already have enough projects so this will have to remain nothing more than a thought. Otherwise it would be just another project that I'd never get to.  



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

69 Parisienne 2 dr ht 427

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4505
Date:

gparis7 wrote:
Cam, now you are making me want to build up a 292. There's one for sale locally out of a late 60s Chev pickup. I'd like to get it, but what would I put it in? 

Truth is that I already have enough projects so this will have to remain nothing more than a thought. Otherwise it would be just another project that I'd never get to.  


 Build up a '68 Beaumont and make it like a Chilean GTA with an inline six. You'll have to do something with the hood, or better yet run a turbo (hey...!). Maybe create a Canadian Beaumont version of the LeMans Sprint.

 

Years ago I seriously looked at a '67 Tempest 2-door post in from California. It originally was an OHC-6 automatic but had a 305 / th350 swapped in. Still had the OHC emblems. I was thinking that would be a great place to drop in my low-deck 292 (made out of a 250, with clearance cuts, custom rods, pistons & modified early 6-counterweight 292 crank) & sell the 305 / th350 pkg. I already have a stout TH350 in the garage. In the end I bought my wife some art for our anniversary, probably the better move.



__________________

67 Chevelle Malibu Sport Coupe, Oshawa-built 250 PG never disturbed.

In garage, 296 cid inline six & TH350...

Cam, Toronto.


I don't judge a man by how far he's fallen, but by how far back he bounces - Patton



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4508
Date:

CdnGMfan wrote:


 Build up a '68 Beaumont and make it like a Chilean GTA with an inline six. You'll have to do something with the hood, or better yet run a turbo (hey...!). Maybe create a Canadian Beaumont version of the LeMans Sprint.

 


         Not a bad idea. I'd like a 65 Beaumont or Chevelle or Buick Special 2 dr post; or one of the same models from 68 or 69. 



__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

69 Parisienne 2 dr ht 427

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.