Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 64 Chevelle Wagon


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2908
Date:
64 Chevelle Wagon


I looked at a 4 dr wagon today and it looks pretty original, but it doesn't have a boxed frame, weird eh? I'm not very interested in it but could use the clip. The guy wants 1500 and I think thats to much. It has a 283 non-runner in it but the body only has rust around the rear windows and hood lip. I thought a wagon had a El Camino boxed frame under it. What do you think? 

__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4321
Date:

Owned many wagons(64).
They do not have boxed frames.

Sounds like a neat car

__________________

Beaumontguru

MY BEAUMONT HAS 4 STUDDED TIRES AND 2 BLOCKHEATERS......AND LOTS OF OIL UNDERNEATH.  The other one has a longer roof.



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 9175
Date:

Wagon frame is the same lengh as Elcamino but not boxed. Lots of roof for suport

__________________


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2908
Date:

This a parts car for a wagon guy and it's located on Vancouver Island. If anybodies interested let me know. As for the boxed frame I learned something today.

__________________


Uber Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 3986
Date:

I have an '65 El Camino and the frame is not boxed.

__________________

Remember Fun,

 Remember Laughter ?



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2336
Date:

really?  it should be.. all rags and caminos had boxed frames to support the "no roof structure" issue..  weird.

__________________


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2908
Date:

65Camino wrote:

I have an '65 El Camino and the frame is not boxed.



That's not normal but I have seen exceptions. I found a 64 SD HT with a boxed frame. Strange but true. My 65 El Camino has a boxed frame.

 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.