Save 5% at Vevor and Support Canadian Poncho!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: more Pontiacs at the RM Auction to look at


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7104
Date:
RE: more Pontiacs at the RM Auction to look at


67BBSD wrote:

this is for the "Pontiac" fans

back in the day that George was doing these no charge-I thought I should get it checked before spending the $500 firm

223379N107672

trim blue

color cameo white

A02
B32
C50,D55,G80,H02,JL2,J50,L74,M40,N10,N34,N41,N98,T42,U25,U26,U63,V48,WS4,W62,W66,W84,Y96

 

lets not forget it had a chrome front bumper, a chevy small block, no winsdhield and a dog living in it. The car was sold before I got this paperwork-changed hands a couple times locally before heading stateside-any bets its a rust free original panel car today ?



69 T/A?

 



__________________







Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6366
Date:

68sd wrote:

67BBSD wrote:

 

this is for the "Pontiac" fans

back in the day that George was doing these no charge-I thought I should get it checked before spending the $500 firm

223379N107672

trim blue

color cameo white

A02
B32
C50,D55,G80,H02,JL2,J50,L74,M40,N10,N34,N41,N98,T42,U25,U26,U63,V48,WS4,W62,W66,W84,Y96

 

lets not forget it had a chrome front bumper, a chevy small block, no winsdhield and a dog living in it. The car was sold before I got this paperwork-changed hands a couple times locally before heading stateside-any bets its a rust free original panel car today ?



69 T/A?

 



yes, sorry I should have said that, L74 auto, When I was in high school she drove it regularly-she always said 69 Trans Am-it was blue before it was white but I guess it was white before it was blue ! Got thinking one day that at the very least the spoiler and fender snorkles had to be GM so I ordered paperwork-they weren't that expensive of a car at the time-but it was low production

 



__________________
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6366
Date:

68sd wrote:

i believe that cars from Cobourg,i have a picture buyt it had no trim tag.cry
the owner has died a few years back and the wife and son were selling it,i believe there was a green 70 Charger as well.
anyway it was once for sale for $60,000 bucks

not sure if its a real 396? never saw the paperwork?
i think Clints mom is a friend of the owner?

-- Edited by 68sd on Tuesday 20th of October 2009 01:22:04 PM




 yes, you had me thinking-I checked today-no trim tag, I was telling my wife and she said thats why I didn't pay the 10 in the day-wasn't sure it was L34-so I sent for paperwork-it was sold before I called back-I'm sure I wasn't prompt-it needed a complete.

today's $25,000 sounds inline-but too much stuff to change around unless you like it the way it is

still prefer 67's



__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 7104
Date:

i used to think it was well modified ,but im sure know now how rare it really is

__________________







Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6366
Date:

68sd wrote:

i used to think it was well modified ,but im sure know now how rare it really is




 I believe it was drag raced from day one. I seen it in 2003 after it sitting in the same spot since 1977-tons of modifications-super radical big block, tranny was in the trunk (so he thought )-wrong rear axle housing, had gauges/tach/steering wheel/wheels etc... the body was quite good though-it was a legend in a barn storey-drove out there one snowy day in feb with the money in my front pocket-car was good but not what was described.

 Seems nobody was overly excited today at 25 either-the green one although a small block was less modified looking better selling at 23



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.