Enjoy 5% OFF at VEVOR Canada! and Support Canadian Poncho at the Same Time!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Big block cylinder heads


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 225
Date:
Big block cylinder heads


What is a good cylinder head to use on my .030 over 396 ?  The engine came out of a 1968 Pontiac 2+2 ( 396 2 bbl ) so I think the heads might be wrong with my cam and Q-jet. I checked out the casting numbers and its 3933148, I would like a little more punch from my rat and wondering if heads with a bit bigger valve would help out ? I am not try to set a record for the quarter mile so I would like a cast head so I can have some driveability.

Kevin

__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 27404
Date:

THESE look nice

__________________

Todd
Site Founder

Like us on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/CanadianPoncho

Canadian Poncho World Headquarters - Prince Edward Island

 

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1136
Date:

69Laurentian wrote:

THESE look nice



and they only cost around $2k biggrin

 



__________________

VOTE CONSERVATIVE.

66 parisienne, 427



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 225
Date:

My name is Poorfeller not Rockefeller ! hmm

__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

my all stock matching numbers big block of 427 cubic feet has .049 heads   poor mans Hot Rod heads

__________________

 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

12-09-08 11:39 AM - Post#1581090
In response to Jim.Biron

The 781's and the 049 casting numbers (last 3 digits) are the best oval port heads that GM made for performance. Nothing wrong with them at all up to around 550-600hp with the larger 2.19-1.88 valves installed and a lil' bowl hoggin' and gakset matching. Lots of people run 'em including me on my 496.



__________________

 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 27404
Date:

$939 at Jegs


tin indian wrote:

 

69Laurentian wrote:

THESE look nice



and they only cost around $2k biggrin

 

 




 



__________________

Todd
Site Founder

Like us on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/CanadianPoncho

Canadian Poncho World Headquarters - Prince Edward Island

 

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1691
Date:

427carl wrote:

12-09-08 11:39 AM - Post#1581090
In response to Jim.Biron

The 781's and the 049 casting numbers (last 3 digits) are the best oval port heads that GM made for performance. Nothing wrong with them at all up to around 550-600hp with the larger 2.19-1.88 valves installed and a lil' bowl hoggin' and gakset matching. Lots of people run 'em including me on my 496.



YUP. If you have to buy a used set and get them done, you should be able to get away with $400-$700 total investment.

Ah, that'll be a standard re-build with a 3 angle valve job, not what Carl has above.
( In my neck of the woods)

 



-- Edited by 68post on Tuesday 15th of February 2011 10:40:23 PM

__________________

Barry -

2 x 68 Beaumonts, 1post, 1 hardtop (projects)

2x 65 Chevelle 300 deluxe (projects)

69 SS396 300 deluxe post

 

 

 

Fredericton,NB

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1774
Date:

why don't you get  a set of over sized valves I'm guessing your heads are cast iron so you could take them to  a machine shop and get them ported  a little  just so you could get the bigger valves in there lol poor mans performance lol

__________________

1967 parisienne 

 



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1932
Date:

You have good heads on there (depending on how much hp you are looking at making!)... the weakest link in that engine (and other low hp 396s) is the cam... and of course timing if you're dialed in at stock specs...it kills the engine! What cam do you have? intake?

Without knowing more about your combo, first steps are lunati 60202 (or 03) cam, 4bbl, timing in the range of 24 base and 36 all-in (factory is retarded!)

...if you want more, put larger valves in the heads 2.19 intake, and go with the bigger of the 2 cams... 2400 stall, what gears do you have? 1.75" headers...

ak

__________________

Wpg, MB to London, ON

Numbers don't match! Especially HP and ET. 



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 225
Date:

The cam is a 325 hp grind, Q-Jet and Edelbrock Q396 ( 70's vintage )  aluminum  intake , stock exhaust manifolds ( I don't like headers and am trying to keep the car as original as i can ) 2 1/2 front pipes with rhino mufflers and 2 1/4 tail pipes. The trans is a 5 speed tremac with a 327 first gear and my rear end has 373's  I am not trying to burn up the street I was just wondering if the heads are starving the engine, with the small intake valves and if it could run better by changing the heads. The engine was originally a 396 2 bbl out of a 68 2+2 Pontiac.

Kevin

__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

with that much trans. multipication 3.27 x 3.73   and a big block, and stock manifolds  you REALLY don't need more heads  (2 cents)  

put the headers on and then you need heads  

My  engine has a cam sooo big, it was put in in two pieces, to clear the lobes biggrin and then had Rhodes lifters added to bleed it down,  with a race prepped carb and the super charger and 250 shot NOS  it makes 1400 horse power at 7200

__________________

 

Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1932
Date:

That cam is hurting the engine most of all... its too small. On a budget, even a summit 1301 would be a noticeable improvement... the heads aren't the weakest link in that combo, yet, imo. If you get the exhaust to breathe and step up to a larger cam, then perhaps upgrading your heads would add benefit...

do you know what your timing is set at? at idle and all-in? having a properly set up distributor was a HUGE change in my 396....seriously worth it. I have a very similar set up to yours, stock heads, summit 1300 cam, headers, etc. I wish i had a bigger cam in it, it runs way too smooth for my tastes... but it has enough power to push you back into the seat a bit...

I think if you change the cam, and bump up the timing, you'll have a smile on your face!!

ak

ps with those gears you are probably running out of cam so quick as well...it falls flat at around 4700rpm, more cam and you will also be able take advantage of a power band for a bit longer (lets say 5400rpm). Just make sure you replace the springs too!

-- Edited by ak 67sd on Thursday 17th of February 2011 12:52:15 AM

__________________

Wpg, MB to London, ON

Numbers don't match! Especially HP and ET. 



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 20744
Date:

427carl wrote:

My  engine has a cam sooo big, it was put in in two pieces, to clear the lobes biggrin and then had Rhodes lifters added to bleed it down,  with a race prepped carb and the super charger and 250 shot NOS  it makes 1400 horse power at 7200




Are you telling tall tales again?biggrin

 



__________________

Prince Edward Island

'64 Parisienne CS "barn find" - last on the road in '86 ... Owner Protection Plan booklet, original paint, original near-mint aqua interior, original aqua GM floor mats, original 283, factory posi, and original rust.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 778
Date:

I have some 781's for sale cheep but i'm afraid the shipping from here would ruin the good price.  I have 781's on my big block. Had them cut for 2.19/1.88 valves and a nice porting job done.  Altogether cost about $700 (including new stainless swirl polished valves and springs to match my new cam.) Very happy with them.

__________________


Paul

67 Beaumont 2dr/ht

 454/t400/9inch

In Lethbridge, Alberta

My build thread! Starting over, My 67 Beaumont build thread.



Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 225
Date:

I forgot that I did change the cam to a Crane  CHQ 272 H10 last year and drilled out my primary jets from .071 to .073, everyone I talked to says that those heads are a open chamber and were the lowest hp rating from gm 265 hp!  also went to a crane breakerless ignition and a higher output coil. So this is why I am inquiring !

KC

__________________


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 163
Date:

I went with stock heads 3degree valve grind 7/16 push rods high volume oil pump cam was 550/525 280/290 crane cam with double roller timing chain. Torker 2 intake with 780 holley and HEI ignition. A turbo 400 with stage 2 shift kit and 2500 stall helps it idle at a stop sign. At the rear is stock 10 bolt posi with 3:08 gears. It is nice to drive,sounds good and not bad on gas.O i forgot headers 3 inch to turbo mufflers 2 1/2 to tail pipes.

__________________
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons
Nov 18 to Dec 2 Black Friday UP TO 50% OFF Plus Huge Coupons


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 9525
Date:

there was a set of 781`s at the Ancaster swap meet for $100



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 778
Date:

69SD wrote:

I forgot that I did change the cam to a Crane  CHQ 272 H10 last year and drilled out my primary jets from .071 to .073, everyone I talked to says that those heads are a open chamber and were the lowest hp rating from gm 265 hp!  also went to a crane breakerless ignition and a higher output coil. So this is why I am inquiring !

KC


 Yup those heads are open chamber and used on some of the lowest output big blocks. Their also some of the best flowing bbc heads gm made. I've seen lots of builds well into the 700-800 hp range with these heads.(thats with port work and bigger valves.)

 

Those motors were low hp because of low compression, restrictive intake and exaust. It doesnt take much to wake those motors up.

 



__________________


Paul

67 Beaumont 2dr/ht

 454/t400/9inch

In Lethbridge, Alberta

My build thread! Starting over, My 67 Beaumont build thread.



Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 2115
Date:

nothing wrong with your heads, definetly a rebuild with bigger valves and bowl work, and the guys are right stock 325 horse cams have very small lobes, something with a .500 or so lift and under 290 duration with dual pattern more scavenjing on the exhaust would wake it up and keep it driveable



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 697
Date:

not a bad idea

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.