Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 2011 Pontiac T/A


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 78
Date:
2011 Pontiac T/A


Has anyone read this article in Hot Rod, its kinda cool.  Just think if they did build this, would Pontiac still be around?

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_1003_2011_pontiac_trans_am/index.html



-- Edited by 52Chieftain on Friday 18th of February 2011 01:58:49 PM

__________________
TC

"Capture the creature and return the Illudium Pew-36 Explosive Space Modulator!"

Haredevil Hare                1948   
The Hasty Hare               1952  
Hare-Way to the Stars    1957   


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

52Chieftain wrote:

Has anyone read this article in Hot Rod, its kinda cool.  Just think if they did build this, would Pontiac still be around?

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/hrdp_1003_2011_pontiac_trans_am/index.html




would Pontiac still be around?  No  no Nice car though


__________________

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 813
Date:

Lingenfelter's aftermarket company is building them, saw one at Barrett jackson auction, only had about 850 hp with intercooled turbo charger! biggrinbiggrinbiggrinLooks better than the Camaro IMHO.no offense intended.  [ I'm ducking from the forth coming barbs from the new Camaro owners]

__________________


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:

I have a Camaro  and I think the  Camaro looks good

and the Firebird version looks good too...   but it will be 2 times the cost of a Camaro

__________________

 



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4518
Date:

It's a nice variation on the Camaro theme but given the relatively low price of a Camaro, is it worth the premium?

__________________

62 Catalina 2 dr post project

55 Bel Air 2 dr post 265PP/PG

68 Bel Air 2 dr post BB project

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.