Wish we could prove that. Andrew (2qwik2c) and I spent some time in that yard last year I had told you about. There's a few of the big bars there and seems to be no pattern.
And closer to home, the 66 GP I bought last fall has F40 and has a small front bar. It's a head scratcher.
__________________
1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles
1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
Springs and shocks were different from f40 to f41 aswell. I believe f41 cars had a lower ride height aswell. F40 was basically the station wagon suspension, in 67 f40 was not available on a wagon cause it already had it.
__________________
1967 2dr Biscayne. L36, M40, G80, K05, F41. #'s. 1967 Impala convert. 283, glide. Parked in the garage since 74 and hasn't moved. Soon to be BB 4speed.
Wish we could prove that. Andrew (2qwik2c) and I spent some time in that yard last year I had told you about. There's a few of the big bars there and seems to be no pattern.
And closer to home, the 66 GP I bought last fall has F40 and has a small front bar. It's a head scratcher.
I think the front sway bar on 65 and 66 cars was smaller than on 67 to 70 with or without F40. My understanding of the differecnes between F40 and F41 are: spring rates (F40 are stiffer - larger wire) than F41, plus F41 has the rear bar. That's how my 68 Caprice is outfitted.
I've seen several 6 cyl & small block V8 Chev and Cdn Pontiac cars from 67-70 with the F40 large front bar, but in every case, without exception, those cars had a 12 bolt rear end. I also had three Canadian 67-68 wagons with the big diameter springs, but they each only 10 bolt rear ends. That was wierd to me.
Its actually interesting about the ride height when discussing F41 suspension. When my Strato Chief came into the dealership in 1968 I hated the way it sat. The front end was very low, compared to the rear, and the style on the street at that time, in Ontario, was that the front end should be higher than the rear. I went to CTC and bought the spring expanders, (or whatever you would like to call them), and installed them in the front coils. You would adjust the nut in the middle of the expander which would enlarge the space between the two coils you installed it in, thus lifting the front of the car. A friend had a 68 Biscayne, also 427-385 hrs., with an F41, and he did the same thing. In retrospect, the ride height being lower for an F41 suspension vehicle is absolutely correct, at least in my opinion, as I thought at the time it looked wrong. By the way, even with me messing with the geometry of the front end by lifting it with those dumb CTC parts, the car at 120 plus miles per hour handled like a dream. I know by todays standards this would be considered extremely dangerous but you must remember 45 years ago there were a lot less cars on the road and the risks were not as extreme as today. Just as a matter of interest, I hope, when I ordered my car the heavy duty suspension was going to cost me $6.00, I think, and the special suspension (F41), cost me $24.00.
