Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Canadian Poncho Homepage -> Canadian Poncho -> 58-64 Full Size Body Tech -> Windshield Question
Post Info TOPIC: Windshield Question
HonestDave


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 455
Date:
Windshield Question
Permalink  

Just want to verify my assumption.

I'm thinking in this group of full size GM cars: 2 door hardtop windshield fits 4 door hardtop fits convertible.

                                                                        2 door sedan fits 4 door sedan fits wagon.

Is this about right, or am I off track somewhere?

A fellow I just met bought a windshield apparently from a 2 door for his 4 door full size 64 Chev, thinking all of them are the same. I don't believe they are. Any thoughts?



-- Edited by HonestDave on Wednesday 12th of March 2014 08:53:32 PM

__________________

Richmond BC
4SPEED427


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 48752
Date:
Permalink  

Somewhere there is a discussion on this. I believe beaumontguru clarified it for us a while back. I'll see if I can find that link for you. It should be in the 58-64 Body or General I would think.

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
4SPEED427


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 48752
Date:
Permalink  

It's in the library.

canadianponcho.activeboard.com/t32419928/1964-pontiac-windshield-information/forum.spark

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
4SPEED427


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 48752
Date:
Permalink  

And now you will want to know model numbers to decipher that.

11 is 2 door post

35 and 45 are wagon

37 is 2 dr ht

39 is 4 dr ht

67 is convert

69 is 4 dr sedan

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
beaumontguru


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 4294
Date:
Permalink  

1962 i asume

the 2dr HT windshield is unique,  

2dr post, bubbletop belair, wagon, 4dr sedan are all the same

I think 4dr HT is unique as well.



__________________

Beaumontguru

MY BEAUMONT HAS 4 STUDDED TIRES AND 2 BLOCKHEATERS......AND LOTS OF OIL UNDERNEATH.  The other one has a longer roof.
HonestDave


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 455
Date:
Permalink  

I just finished a book on optical illusions, and now this chart :) Yikes !!
Think I'll look again in the morning. Thanks for the info.

__________________

Richmond BC
4SPEED427


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 48752
Date:
Permalink  

Oh c'mon, that's been my life doing GM parts looking at pages like that for 34 years!!! It's all good, no worries, just take your time.


__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
HonestDave


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 455
Date:
Permalink  

Carl Stevenson wrote:

Oh c'mon, that's been my life doing GM parts looking at pages like that for 34 years!!! It's all good, no worries, just take your time.

 I hope they're giving you a massive pension, because you deserve it !!!  :)



__________________

Richmond BC
poncho62


Poncho Master!

Status: Offline
Posts: 1051
Date:
Permalink  

With my 62 ragtop, I put in a windshield from a hardtop.....I understand the sedan ones were different

__________________


Hanover, Ont

Ontario Rodders Forum
4SPEED427


A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 48752
Date:
Permalink  

Wrong thread Johnnee, you're supposed to only post in the "derail" thead

__________________

1966 Strato Chief 2 door, 427 4 speed, 45,000 original miles 

1966 Grande Parisienne, 396 1 of 23 factory air cars
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Canadian Poncho Homepage -> Canadian Poncho -> 58-64 Full Size Body Tech -> Windshield Question
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.