Enjoy 5% OFF at VEVOR Canada! and Support Canadian Poncho at the Same Time!
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: DELETE


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Online
Posts: 4415
Date:
DELETE


Delete



-- Edited by beaumontguru on Sunday 11th of October 2020 09:24:53 AM

__________________

Beaumontguru

MY BEAUMONT HAS 4 STUDDED TIRES AND 2 BLOCKHEATERS......AND LOTS OF OIL UNDERNEATH.  The other one has a longer roof.



A Poncho Legend!

Status: Offline
Posts: 35601
Date:
RE: FS: GM recall torque straps pair small block Mint shape


IMG_3183.jpg



Attachments
__________________

 

Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now
Fall into savings UP TO C $50 OFF Shop now


Addicted!

Status: Offline
Posts: 281
Date:
Recall notice


I had never seen nor heard of these before.

 

http://www.novaresource.org/history/recall.jpg

 

Quite interesting.



__________________

1959 Pontiac Laurentian - 1956 MG Magnette ZA - 1962 Dodge Dart 440 - 1962 Hillman Minx - 1977 Ford LTD Landau - 2017 Ford Fusion Platinum - 1963 Imperial Crown- 2008 Sebring  Convertible 

www.everythingelectronic.ca



Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5021
Date:
RE: FS: GM recall torque straps pair small block Mint shape


-Robert M- wrote:

I had never seen nor heard of these before.

 Quite interesting.


 These straps and brackets  should collector items......I believe they were part of GM's first recall.

 

On December 4, 1971, General Motor (GM) announced it would recall over 6.68 million 1965-70 Chevrolets with defective engine mounts.

The recall covered 1965-69 full-size Chevrolets, 1965-69 Chevy IIs and Novas, 1967-69 Camaros, and 1965-70 Chevrolet/GMC light trucks, all with V8 engines.

(NHTSA Recall 71-0235, now 71V-235.)

https://www.autosafety.org/chevrolet-motor-mounts/

 

On October 15, 1971, NHTSA issued a consumer protection bulletin advising motorists of the potential risks of broken GM engine mounts.

Around this same time, GM President Edward Cole declared that a broken mount was the equivalent of a flat tire or blowout,

and that anyone who could not control a car with a failed mount at 25 mph shouldnt be driving.
   

A few weeks later, NHTSA sent two staff members to GMs engineering facilities in Warren, Michigan to witness more tests of failed motor mounts;

their findings corroborated the results of the earlier tests.

Around this same time, NHTSA Administrator Doug Toms visited GM headquarters and test drove Chevrolets with severed mounts with GM President EJ Cole in the test vehicles,

but NHTSA did not place a record of Toms visit in the public files.
   

NHTSA sent a letter to GM on December 1, stating that it was close to determining that a motor vehicle safety defect did exist.

Three days later, GM announced its recall, but the company refused to admit that the vehicles contained a safety defect.
  

One irony of the recall is that on over 95% of the vehicles recalled, GM did not replace the defective mounts themselves, but rather installed a bracket and cable to restrict engine movement

if a mount broke. By avoiding replacement of engine mounts on all 6.68 million cars, GM managed to cut its recall costs considerably;

the cable and bracket assembly cost about $1 per car, far less than the $50 cost of new motor mounts.
   

For a comprehensive report and materials on the failure of NHTSA to obtain a more timely recall,

see Hearings on Auto Safety Repairs at No Cost, Senate Commerce Comm, 93rd Cong.,

1st Sess. Pp 200-58 (Jan. 30-31, 1973) including Oct. 11, 1972, letter from Chairman Harley O. Staggers,

House Interstate & Foreign Commerce Comm. to NHTSA Administrator Douglas W. Toms.



__________________


Canadian Poncho Superstar!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6975
Date:

Picked up a pair from a bone yard but haven't yet installed them.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
.
Support Canadian Poncho!
Select Amount:
<
.
.
.